A Clarification on Wardriving
August 6th, 2008A recent article by the Associated Press (11 Charged in Connection with Credit Card Fraud) discusses how a group of international criminals hacked into a number of computer networks using “Wardriving”.
And I quote, “Sullivan said the alleged thieves weren’t computer geniuses, just opportunists who used a technique called “wardriving,” which involved cruising through different areas with a laptop and looking for accessible wireless Internet signals. Once they located a vulnerable network, they installed so-called “sniffer programs” that captured credit and debit card numbers as they moved through a retailer’s processing networks.”
Let me stress again, “Wardriving” is a totally legal and legitimate activity which has a poorly chosen name which the public (and the press) doesn’t seem to understand. It is articles like these which cloud the issues and scare people when they hear about Wardriving. All Wardriving does is listen to the networks within range do their thing. To put it another way, Would you consider it a crime to drive around and count the number of houses with red doors on it? No. Neither would I. Well that is all Wardriving is, except instead of counting the number of red doors it is counting the number of wireless access points are in the area. The argument could be taken a step forward, would it be illegal to walk up to each and every house with a red door and check to see if it is unlocked? I’d say that shows criminal intent. So yes, Wardriving CAN be used for illegal activity, the same way a car can be used as a get-away vehicle in a robbery, or a rifle can be used in a murder. All of these things have valid, legitimate uses. I just wish something as harmless and fun as Wardriving wasn’t so criminalized.